Thursday, April 23, 2009

San Fransisco Says Reduce The Hourly Rate For Waiters

From the San Francisco Chronicle
March 28, 2009

Amid the battle between San Francisco's restaurants and City Hall over universal health care, an issue has arisen that could be the savior of struggling restaurants, or spell financial doom for low-paid service workers, depending on who's doing the talking.

It's the idea of a tip credit for waiters, which would reduce the minimum hourly wage that restaurants would have to pay them.

Kevin Westlye, director of the Golden Gate Restaurant Association, said the group might consider dropping a lawsuit it has filed against the city if San Francisco would enact a tip credit.

"It would certainly be a very interesting discussion to have," he said.

At issue is the city's mandate that employers provide health insurance or pay fees to the city to support its universal health care program, Healthy San Francisco. The restaurant association supports the idea of universal health care, but not saddling businesses with more fees.

It sued over the requirement, lost at the U.S. Court of Appeals and has now asked the Supreme Court to take up the suit - and issue an emergency injunction blocking the city's mandate. The court's ruling on the emergency stay could come as soon as Monday.

Restaurant owners say the health care fee is just one more burden in a city that also requires paid sick leave and has one of the nation's highest minimum wages. A tip credit, some owners say, would help rebalance what they consider an off-kilter situation.

But union representatives say restaurants have been asking for a tip credit for at least a decade - whenever a new law comes up that would hurt their bottom line - and the answer now is the same as it's always been.

"It would be ridiculous to even consider something like that," said Tim Paulson, director of the San Francisco Labor Council. "We're proud of having a minimum wage. Though it still doesn't get people out of poverty, it is movement in the right direction."

California is one of seven states that prohibit a tip credit, requiring that waiters earn the same minimum wage as everybody else. In other states, restaurant owners can pay waiters as little as $2.13, the minimum permissible under federal law.

Westlye said San Francisco, which has its own $9.79 minimum wage, could legally decide to reduce waiters' pay to the state minimum wage of $8 without breaking California's no-tip-credit law.

"That would be something that might make the business model of a restaurant in San Francisco a whole lot more sustainable," he said.

Westlye said that whenever the city's minimum wage goes up, restaurant owners raise their menu prices. That means that in addition to the higher minimum wage, waiters earn more in tips, because customers usually calculate that as a percentage of the bill.

Meanwhile, restaurant workers who don't receive tips, like managers and chefs, don't see much of a bump. He said a full-time cook often earns $15 an hour, or $31,000 a year. A waiter, with tips, often makes $30 an hour, or $62,000 a year.

"It creates a delta between the front of the house and the back of the house," he said. "Since restaurants sell food, it would be difficult to take a position that a full-time server has twice the value of a full-time cook."

Dan Scherotter, owner and executive chef at Palio d'Asti downtown, said his kitchen workers haven't received a raise in years, and he recently had to lay off a pastry chef and general manager.

"We're in this perverse situation where every year when the minimum wage goes up, we're giving a raise to our best-paid employees," he said. "You can understand why the health care mandate is the straw that breaks the camel's back."

Mike Casey, president of the local hotel and restaurant workers union, said restaurant owners have been scapegoating tipped employees for years. A tip credit, he said, wouldn't just harm waiters at swanky restaurants, but also those manning coffee shops with a tip jar on the counter.

"You really want to lower the wages of anybody who gets a tip?" he said. "Our members are hit very hard right now - let's not try to subsidize health care on the backs of low-wage workers."

Supervisor David Campos agrees. Last week, he sent a letter to the restaurant association asking it to drop its lawsuit.

"I'm a strong supporter of minimum wage laws, and Healthy San Francisco is a separate issue," he said. "The Golden Gate Restaurant Association should drop its lawsuit because it's the right thing to do, regardless of the tip credit or anything else."

What do you think about this?

Related Stories
Next Post: Going Bananas

Add to Technorati Favorites Top Blogs

5 comments:

Waiter Extraordinaire said...

That is atrocious where some places in the States a waiter gets $2.13 an hour then afterwards has to depend on big tips or else because their hourly wage is peanuts. Good for California and San Fran for paying equality minimum wage to both waiters and other minimum wage jobs. If the cooks are complaining about their $15 an hour let them go out there and show their face! But they can't cause most of them have a personality of a dog's breath. In my opinion if the restaurant owner really wants to change things add a 15% gratuity to each bill and pay the waiter's $40 an hour and have them pay into a benefit plan. The establishment can keep the tacked on gratuity to cover their higher paid out hourly wage. Also the waiter can pay into a retirement plan which right now at that hourly rate they may be lucky to retire on $300 a month! Enough said!

Caleb said...

I've been a waiter for about 4 years and I have never seen servers get 40 hours a week unless he/she was a supervisor. We may make more an hour but it's a lot harder to get a full time schedule, while in the kitchen it's pretty easy to get 40 hours a week or more. Granted, things may be different with higher end dining establishments. Mine is more low to mid tier restaurants.

ranting chef said...

Well if your min wage is like ours in OZ it's pretty shit. The bottom of the pay tree is not nice, been there. As a chef the pay is poor and you do it for the love of the job and your career. But later in life when you need to establish your self in the worldly place, on the min wage its tough. Tips I thought were given as a reward for good food and service like a bonus. Why should anybody be penalized because of that. Pay the staff what they deserve and and let the tips be an extra after all thats the bonus for working your arse of all day without a break or lunch eh
Quote "It creates a delta between the front of the house and the back of the house," he said. "Since restaurants sell food, it would be difficult to take a position that a full-time server has twice the value of a full-time cook." WTF is this, do you waiters earn more than the chefs and get to keep all the tips? Please explain Ranting chef

Hellraiser said...

Haha, right on Ranting Chef! You know, I've never met a good cook from the US, and now I know why. Why would anyone want to work their guts out, day in day out, so the smary waiters take all the glory and all the tips. It's a team effort guys and should be shared equally with all staff.
This industry will work more effeciently when front and back of house teams understand that one can not function without the other, and that it's a 50/50 effort!

banquet manager said...

Hellraiser & Ranting Chef,

You may be right but unfortunately, most cooks never get more than $12 - $15 per hour. Any decent waiter will make more than that with no problem.
Thanks for stopping by. "See" you soon.